Caring for Collections: The Role of Accessioning in Effective Archival Stewardship
Proposal submitted by Rosemary Davis, Accessioning Archivist, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library
Research on Frederick C. Hicks, Yale Law Librarian 1929-1945
Proposal submitted by Stacia Stein, Instructional Services Librarian, Law Library
Mobile Survey Station Service
Proposal submitted by Sarah Tudesco, Program Director, and Jenn Nolte, User Research Experience Librarian, Assessment & User Research
Mobile Interface Device for LSF Staff
Proposal submitted by Michael Dadio, Assistant Manager, Library Collection Services
Summer 2019 Grants Forum: Information about the program, presentations of completed and current projects. Date TBD
Guidelines for Applicants
The Professional Development Grants Program supports innovative research and investigative projects undertaken by members of the Managerial and Professional staff of the Yale University Library. The grants are intended to provide incentive and financial assistance for projects that contribute to the Yale library community through such avenues as scholarly research, creative program applications, program enrichment, or feasibility / pilot studies. The program is administered by the Library's Standing Committee on Professional Awareness (SCOPA).
Grants are awarded once a year, with a call for proposals going out each spring with specific deadlines. Winning proposals are announced within approximately six weeks of the submission deadlines. The SCOPA Grants cycle corresponds with the YUL fiscal year.
Only members of the Managerial and Professional (M&P) YUL staff are eligible to apply as a primary investigator(s), while clerical and technical staff may participate in proposed projects as group members. Members of the SCOPA Grants Subcommittee may not apply for grants or receive grant funds during their terms of service.
Applicants and group participants must obtain any necessary approvals in advance from supervisors and department heads regarding the use of work time, the possibility of release time, the scheduling of vacation time, domestic or international travel, access to collections, tools, equipment, staff support, etc.
Projects impacting two or more departments may require review by the Library Project Review Committee (LPRC). The SCOPA Grants Subcommittee will work, in consultation with the proposal submitter and LPRC, to determine whether LPRC review is necessary.
Proposals are judged by the members of the SCOPA Grants Subcommittee, the SCOPA Chair and a SCOPA co-sponsor or member of the Library Executive Committee (LEC). The grants subcommittee then presents its decision to the SCOPA sponsor, who serves as a liaison to LEC. Proposals are judged according to the following selection criteria:
The maximum amount awarded is approximately $2,500 and is determined by the anticipated level of project expenses. Partial funding of larger projects may be given. All software, equipment, or materials purchased with these funds remain the property of the YUL. Awards are made for one year and all funds must be used within 12 months of the grant project’s start date (corresponding with the YUL fiscal year). Extensions are granted in exceptional cases only (e.g., extended illness, a death in the immediate family); requests for extensions must be made directly to SCOPA. Please visit the SCOPA SharePoint page for information on past grants.
All grant recipients are expected to provide the following:
To apply for funding, please submit the following information via email to the Grants Subcommittee (firstname.lastname@example.org):
1. Project Proposal:
Note: When writing a SCOPA Grant proposal, please use language that is accessible to librarians outside your area of expertise. SCOPA members represent YUL staff from multiple specializations of the information science profession.
2. Departmental Approvals: Documentation concerning issues of work/time release, domestic or international travel, or systems staff support. These can be in the form of emails, letters, or another format that documents the fact of the necessary approvals.
Note: All proposals are judged with the assumption that the necessary approvals have been received. If it becomes apparent during the selection process that the appropriate approvals were not received, the grant will not be awarded. If this becomes apparent after the awarding of the grant, the grant may be withdrawn.
Please direct any questions to any member of the Grants Subcommittee.
Guidelines revised August 2018
Have an idea for a Forum? Contact SCOPA.
Committee Membership: 2017-2018